A space of novel emergence…
Might it be possible to actually communicate a transcendence of the conceptual?
How would this be achieved?
Can one speak of methodology with regard to such a quest?
Or could such methods be obstructive, rather than instructive?
Is the mere inculcation of ‘structure’ sufficient, without a deeper, living understanding of its play?
For me a transcendance of the conceptual is possible if as Paul Feyerabend invites us, we think and act outside stable frameworks and fixed paths: http://www.kjf.ca/31-C2BOR.htm. It is as he claims mysticism with arguments. I have been calling it “diachronic ontology”: http://terenceblake.wordpress.com/2012/09/21/is-ontology-making-us-stupid-diachronic-vs-synchronic-ontologies/
I like Paul Feyerabend, I think he’s great!
“mysticism with arguments”: I can empathise with that.
Have to read your paper!
[…] Knaphni, Artxell (2012) at Visions of Temporal Accumulation: After Thought ? After Mind ? – http://visionfiction.theotechne.com/WordPress/?p=6#comments […]